
coldwell Banker - july 2005 MARKET
FLASH
Statistical data from CAR and DataQuick
IT’S TOPPING OUT…NO IT’S NOT…YES IT IS…ACK!
(Reprise)
Intro: Another
double-digit increase in statewide median home prices will put
many potential buyers in a serious bind for affordability. Interest
rates, a dubious press, relaxing inventories and a fiendishly complicated
international situation are all pulling the market in different
directions, and how much elasticity it can muster to respond is
anybody’s guess. As you read on, don’t be distracted
by the big numbers that you’ll certainly find; instead watch
for trends and countertrends.
Statistics:
Statewide: The median
resale price of a single-family detached home in California for
May was $522,590, an increase of about 13 percent over May 2004.
Unsold resale inventory represented a 2.8-month supply, compared
to 1.6 months for the same period a year ago. Median number of
days till sale was 27 in May, up from 22 for May 2004.
Top Ten List: Los Altos,
$1,620,000; Beverly Hills, $1,450,000; Saratoga, $1,428,500; Manhattan
Beach, $1,375,000; Laguna Beach, $1,302,500; Newport Beach, $1,300,000;
Burlingame, $1,237,500; Coronado, $1,225,000; Santa Barbara, $1,188,000;
Palos Verdes, $1,147,500. Two years ago in May, only the top median
on the list (and yes, it was Los Altos) was over a million; this
month, they all are. The Southland shows strongly. Even though
Northern California makes first, third, and seventh, that’s
still only three out of ten. It’s no surprise to see Santa
Barbara, which has been notable lately for doing well, and Coronado
can be relied upon to make two or three appearances a year.
Bay Area: May median price,
at $721,730, has shot up by 11-plus percent from May 2004 and sagged
by a hair for the month; sales are up by over three percent for
the month but down by 8.3 percent compared to a year earlier. The
Santa Clara County median price of $721,730 is up 18% for the year.
Santa Cruz County tells much the same story with a comparable increase
in median but sales down over 20 percent from a year ago. Monterey
County and region have robust medians, but sales activity is down
significantly for both the month and year; sources of disposable
income are fluctuating so rapidly that it’s impossible to
speculate whether relatively weak sales are a product of sparse
funds or simply changes in fashion. The Wine Country, meanwhile,
is the strongest-performing region in Northern California, with
a year-to-year median up by $170,000-plus.
Sacramento/Capitol Region: Showing
strongly, with a countywide median price 24 percent over May 2004.
Year-to-year sales are down, but by less than one percent. Lincoln
and Rancho Cordova are bright spots.
Interest Rates: “Irrational
exuberance” is hardly our favorite phrase given its checkered
history, but at the moment there’s almost nothing to substitute
for it. Rates sank to just above five percent at the end of May,
rose to 5.25% in the middle of June, and at this writing have settled
to just above five, in a mini-version of the big bounce earlier
this year. With its eye on our international credit rating (and
reputation), the Fed would be relieved if rates went up a little,
but lenders with their purely domestic priorities are holding rates
down; when the dollars being borrowed are weak, there’s no
point in paying a lot for them. The national residential market
is currently a pivotal source of economic strength, and no one – probably
not even the Fed – seriously wants to cool it off.
Inventory: Unsold inventory,
at roughly three months, is much better than it was last year;
but is improved selection enough to counter the dire pressures
of – in the words of C.A.R. President Jim Hamilton – “eroding
affordability and concerns about rising interest rates?” Inventory
has been, at least intermittently, a primary constraint on Northern
California’s residential market for years; at the moment
it’s not exerting its customary influence, because it’s
being swamped by high prices and the inescapable volatility of
pertinent economic indicators.
News Media: Currently
the joker in the pack, because the stability – or alleged
lack of it – in selected residential markets has become front-page-above-the-fold
news for influential papers, including the New York Times. We’re
not sure why so many people have started thinking that residential
real estate might be a bubble, since it seems to us that real property
has proven itself in the long run to be a particularly good investment.
Overall Assessment: Interest
rates are still attractive by almost any standard, but prices in
anything beyond starter neighborhoods are becoming truly painful,
and it’s too soon to say how residential purchasing might
be distorted by a falling dollar and changing patterns of cash
flow. The market remains vigorous, but its long-term stability
is hardly guaranteed, so take advantage of the beautiful weather
to get out there and dazzle some prospects. You know you’d
love to take a vacation this summer; now is when you’ll make
the money to do it.

